Land Use LA
Connect with us
  • Home
  • Our Services
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Our Projects
  • Our Partner Firms
  • Make a Payment

Planning Commission To Consider New ADU Rules

11/28/2018

0 Comments

 
One of the most successful – and controversial – methods of adding housing to Los Angeles will be on the agenda of Thursday’s City Planning Commission meeting, the latest step in the city developing its own rules for Accessory Dwelling Units, or ADUs.
 
The focus of Thursday’s hearing is updated recommendations and options from the City Planning Department, as instructed by the Planning Commissioners at a hearing earlier this fall. The Planning Department’s recommendations include:
  • Allowing ADUs in Hillside areas by either allowing them in all Hillside areas that are not in a designated Hillside Construction Regulations Supplemental Use District (HCR-SUD) or by allowing them throughout the Hillside areas but only if one of the following three criteria are met:
  1. The lot is located within 1⁄4-mile of a public transportation stop;
  2. The lot fronts a paved vehicular roadway that is 24 feet wide from the subject property until it reaches the nearest publicly-maintained road; or
  3. One parking space is provided onsite for the ADU.
 
  • Not providing a guaranteed minimum for ADUs, meaning that the Residential Floor Area (RFA) for any ADU plus all other structures on the subject property must collectively adhere to the RFA limit per the lot’s underlying zoning.
 The most significant of the department’s recommendations is the additional options for ADU development in Hillside areas. Whether to allow ADUs in the city’s Hillside areas has been the most contentious issue as the city has wrestled with developing its ADU policy. The city’s current rules allow ADUs in Hillside areas under the same limits and restrictions as any other parts of the city because the city’s current ADU rules are mandated by the state.
 
But many residents and homeowners groups in Hillside areas have urged the city to disallow ADUs in their neighborhoods with the new rules that are being crafted. These Hillside residents say that their streets are too narrow and parking too scarce to allow additional residential units in their neighborhoods.
 
Those who support ADUs in Hillside areas say that homeowners in those areas should have the same rights to add granny flats and other small living spaces to their lots as other homeowners around the city have. It has also been argued that as the city increases its density and develops more housing options, all portions of the city should densify not just the flatlands.
 
The HCR-SUD areas are relatively new and currently only cover three Hillside neighborhoods: Bel-Air, Laurel Canyon and the Bird Streets (north of Sunset Boulevard and east of the City of Beverly Hills). Additional Hillside areas could be designated HCR-SUDs through a City Planning process that can take a year or more to complete.
 
The CPC is expected to take testimony Thursday and vote on the recommendations made by City Planning staff. Presuming the Commissioners vote to recommend approval of new ADU rules, it will likely be still several months before the rules take effect, and that assumes that both the City Council and the mayor support the ADU rules as well.
 
The CPC's decision could greatly impact what has in less than 2 years become one of the most successful programs in Los Angeles to add lower-cost housing to a city that is woefully under-housed. Since the state-mandated ADU rules went into effect on Jan. 1, 2017, the city has received more than 7,700 permit applications for ADUs compared to 536 applications in 2015 and 2016 combined.

- Chris Parker
Chris@PCClA.com
818-591-9309

The current draft ordinance can be found here:
 
Current Draft Ordinance (pdf)
 
The City Planning Department staff report can be found here:
 
City Planning Department Staff Report (pdf)
 
And here’s the agenda for Thursday’s CPC meeting (the ADU case is item #8):
 
Agenda for Thursday’s CPC Meeting (pdf)
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

      Subscribe
      Receive our posts.

    Subscribe

    RSS Feed

    Tweets by @LandUseLA

    Client Disclosure

    The stories posted on LandUseLA.com are about interesting or controversial developments in Los.Angeles. They are not promotional pieces about my clients. If any story involves a current or former client, that fact will be disclosed prominently on that story's page or within the story itself.
    - Chris Parker, publisher

    Archives

    December 2018
    November 2018
    April 2018
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    December 2012

    Categories

    All
    Bel Air
    Bel-air
    Beverly Grove
    Bho
    Bmo
    Building & Safety
    Cd1
    Cd10
    Cd11
    Cd12
    Cd13
    Cd14
    Cd15
    Cd2
    Cd3
    Cd4
    Cd5
    Cd7
    Cd8
    Cd9
    Charter School
    City Council
    City Planning Commission
    Community Design Overlay
    Conditional Use Permit
    Conservation
    Cultural Heritage Commission
    Draft Mnd
    Drive-through Restaurant
    Eir
    Elder Care
    El Sereno
    General Plan Amendment
    Granada Hills
    Greater Wilshire Neighborhood Council
    Harbor
    Highland Park
    Hillside
    Historic
    Historic-Cultural Monument
    Hollywood
    Koreatown
    La Brea
    Land Use
    Little Tokyo
    Macarthur Park
    Mansionization
    Master Plan
    Merger
    Mid City
    Mid-City
    Mixed Use
    Mixed-use
    Mural Ordinance
    Northeast La
    Northridge
    Nvapc
    Plan Approval
    Planning Department
    Plum
    Plum Committee
    R1
    Residential Floor Area
    Rfa
    San Pedro
    Sherman Oaks
    Small Lot Subdivision
    Svapc
    Sylmar
    Valley Village
    Van Nuys
    West Adams
    Westlake
    Westlake South Neighborhood Council
    Wilmington
    Wilshire
    Winnetka
    Zone Change

    RSS Feed